Walner Law® Secures $222,000 Jury Verdict For Victim Of A Chicago Rear-End Bus Accident

Picture of Walner Law®
Walner Law®

March 7, 2012

the balance closed up
Share

In the case against the Chicago Transit Authority, the Chicago attorneys at Walner Law® achieved a $222,000 jury verdict for a client who suffered serious injuries to his lower back in a rear-end bus accident. Our client had stopped at a red light in a Chicago intersection when a city bus rear-ended his vehicle. Many victims of rear-end accidents suffer lower back injuries, but because our client was struck by a bus, his injuries were more severe. He not only sustained a herniated disc at his L5-21 vertebrae, but also a tear in his left rotator cuff. Our client underwent extensive physical therapy and epidural injections to control the high level of pain he was experiencing, and he will also need surgery to repair the herniated disc. Our client missed four months of work because of restrictions after his accident, and his upcoming surgery will force him to miss even more time. The Illinois jury that evaluated our client’s injury included both past and future damages in his $222,000 verdict, including:

  • $89,500 for medical expenses
  • $70,000 for physical and emotional pain and suffering
  • $45,000 for loss of normal life
  • $17,000 for lost wages and time off work

The Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) initially denied liability for the bus accident, presenting evidence that our client had made a “sudden stop.” However, as the jury rightly determined, since our client was stopped at a red light, it stands to reason that the CTA bus driver should have anticipated the sudden stop and avoided a collision. If you have been injured in a Chicago bus accident, you can trust our personal injury lawyers at Walner Law® to pursue the justice and fair compensation you deserve. Please contact us today to schedule a free case evaluation.

Related Posts

February 18th

What Happens When a “Normal” Test Result Was Actually a Warning Sign: Misdiagnosis and Malpractice

Your mammogram report says “no significant findings.” Six months later, a lump you can feel leads to a biopsy showing breast cancer that’s already…
February 17th

Recovering Damages When a Delay Reduced Your Chance of Recovery: “Loss of Chance” and Medical Malpractice Claims

Your doctor dismissed persistent headaches for six months before ordering the MRI that revealed a brain tumor. By then, surgery required removing tissue that…
February 16th

Understanding the “Discovery Rule” When a Diagnosis Comes Too Late: Illinois Malpractice Statute of Limitations

Your primary care doctor dismisses persistent stomach pain for two years, attributing it to stress and diet. By the time a gastroenterologist orders the…
Get your Free Consultation
Take the first step towards justice and solidify your future.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
By providing your phone number, you agree to receive text messages from Walner Law. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency varies. To opt-out, reply STOP. For help, reply HELP.