Skip to content 
After a car accident on the Dan Ryan, at a busy intersection in the Loop, or along Lake Shore Drive, insurance companies often try to shift blame onto injured drivers. Maybe they say you were going a little too fast. Maybe they claim you should have seen the other car sooner. Their goal is simple: pay you less money by arguing you share some fault.
Illinois uses a system called modified comparative negligence that determines how shared fault affects your compensation. A Chicago car accident lawyer helps protect your claim from unfair blame and fights to preserve its full value, even when the other side points fingers at you.
What to Know About Fault and Compensation in Illinois Car Accidents
- If an insurance company assigns you partial fault, your compensation gets reduced by that percentage, but you may still recover damages.
- Illinois law bars recovery only when your share of fault exceeds 50%, so most accident victims retain the right to pursue compensation.
- Evidence like traffic camera footage, witness statements, and accident reconstruction reports directly impacts how fault is divided.
- Insurance adjusters often try to inflate your fault percentage to minimize payouts, making early legal guidance valuable.
- An experienced attorney gathers evidence and builds arguments that defend you against exaggerated blame.
What Is Modified Comparative Negligence?
Modified comparative negligence is the legal framework Illinois uses to handle car accident claims where more than one party shares responsibility. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1116, an injured person may recover compensation as long as their fault does not exceed 50% of what caused the accident.
This system recognizes that accidents often involve the actions of two or more parties. Another driver might run a red light at State Street and Jackson, but perhaps you were checking your phone at the same moment, or maybe you weren’t wearing a seatbelt. In such cases, your actions may have contributed to the crash or the severity of your injuries to a lesser extent.
How Illinois’ Shared Fault Model Differs From Other States
Illinois falls into a category of states that use modified comparative negligence with a 50% bar rule. Here’s how it compares to other approaches:
- Pure contributory negligence bars recovery if you hold any fault at all, even 1%. Only a handful of states still use this harsh standard.
- Pure comparative negligence allows recovery regardless of your fault percentage. Even if you share more of the blame than the other party.
- Modified comparative negligence lands in the middle. Illinois follows the version where you lose all recovery rights only when your fault exceeds 50%.
How Does Modified Comparative Negligence Actually Work?
The math behind comparative negligence is straightforward, but the process of assigning fault percentages involves investigation, evidence, and often negotiation.
A Chicago intersection example
Imagine you’re driving south on Western Avenue approaching a major intersection. Another driver heading east runs a yellow light just as it turns red and hits your passenger side. However, the insurance company’s investigation reveals you were traveling 10 miles per hour over the posted limit.
The insurance adjuster might argue your speeding contributed to the collision severity. They assign you 25% fault and the other driver 75%.
If your total damages equal $100,000, here’s what happens under Illinois law: your recovery gets reduced by your 25% share, leaving you with $75,000.
When your fault exceeds 50%
Now change the facts. Suppose the evidence shows you ran the red light while the other driver was speeding. The adjuster assigns you 60% fault.
The Illinois Department of Insurance explains that the 50% threshold creates a clear dividing line. At 50% fault or below, you recover compensation, reduced by your share of blame. At 51% or higher, you will lose your right to seek compensation.
This threshold makes the difference between recovering tens of thousands of dollars and walking away empty-handed. When the stakes are this high, the exact fault percentage assigned to you becomes a central battleground in your claim, and the strength of your legal representation is paramount to your recovery.
How Illinois’ Modified Comparative Negligence Impacts Settlement Offers
Insurance adjusters handling claims from accidents on I-90, I-94, or Chicago’s busy arterial streets like Ashland Avenue and Cicero Avenue understand exactly how Illinois’ comparative negligence law works. They use this knowledge strategically.
Adjusters look for anything that shifts fault onto you. Common approaches include:
- Reviewing your recorded statement for admissions about speed, distraction, or visibility
- Obtaining traffic camera footage from nearby Chicago Transit Authority stations or city intersections
- Interviewing witnesses who might remember details differently than you do
- Examining vehicle damage patterns that suggest impact angles or speeds
- Checking your phone records for evidence of texting or app usage near the crash time
Every percentage an insurer adds to your fault reduces what they pay. Without an experienced lawyer actively defending your version of events, insurers can assign blame that sticks, even when it should not. You don’t have to accept the insurance company’s version of events, but you do need effective legal representation to challenge it.
How a Lawyer Defends Against Inflated Fault Claims
Protecting your claim means challenging the evidence and arguments insurance companies use to inflate your fault. This involves:
- Gathering independent evidence that supports your version of events, including surveillance footage from nearby businesses, dashcam recordings, and testimony from accident reconstruction professionals.
- Identifying weaknesses in the other driver’s story and the insurance company’s investigation.
- Presenting essential documents, such as medical records, police reports, and physical evidence that establish the other driver’s primary responsibility.
The goal is to make sure the fault percentage assigned to you accurately reflects what happened, not what benefits the insurance company.
What Evidence Determines Fault Percentages in Illinois?
Fault assignment relies on concrete evidence, not assumptions or guesswork. The stronger your documentation, the better position you hold when negotiating with insurance companies or presenting your case to a jury.
Police reports and traffic citations
When Chicago police respond to an accident near Millennium Park, in Wicker Park, or along the Magnificent Mile, they create an official crash report. This document records officer observations, driver statements, witness accounts, and any citations issued at the scene.
A traffic citation carries significant weight. If the other driver received a ticket for running a red light or following too closely, that violation supports your argument about their negligence. However, police reports aren’t final determinations of fault. They serve as starting points that insurance adjusters and attorneys build upon or challenge.
Witness statements and surveillance footage
Chicago’s density works in your favor when it comes to witnesses. Pedestrians, nearby drivers, business employees, and CTA riders may have seen your accident unfold. Their statements help establish the sequence of events and each driver’s actions.
Surveillance cameras are everywhere in Chicago. Traffic cameras at major intersections, security systems outside businesses, and dashcams in rideshare vehicles all capture footage that may show exactly what happened. Acting quickly matters because these systems overwrite recordings within days or weeks.
Accident reconstruction analysis
Complex crashes sometimes require professional accident reconstruction. These professionals examine vehicle damage, skid marks, debris patterns, and road conditions to determine the speed, impact angle, and driver behavior leading up to the collision.
Reconstruction analysis proves especially valuable on high-speed corridors, such as the Kennedy Expressway or the Stevenson, where split-second decisions and reaction times significantly impact fault determinations.
Common Scenarios Where Comparative Negligence Applies
Modified comparative negligence comes into play whenever both parties contributed to an accident. Some situations raise fault-sharing questions more often than others.
Rear-end collisions with contributing factors
The trailing driver typically bears fault in rear-end crashes because Illinois law requires maintaining safe following distances. However, the lead driver may share responsibility in certain circumstances.
Sudden stops without justification, broken brake lights, or erratic lane changes can shift some fault forward. If you rear-ended someone on the Eisenhower Expressway but their brake lights weren’t functioning, your attorney may argue for reduced fault on your part.
Left-turn accidents at intersections
Left-turning drivers must yield to oncoming traffic under Illinois law. When a collision occurs, the turning driver usually faces primary liability. But what if the oncoming driver was speeding or ran a yellow light?
These accidents, common at busy Chicago intersections throughout Lincoln Park, Hyde Park, and the South Loop, often involve disputed fault percentages. Both drivers often share some responsibility, and the exact split determines compensation amounts.
Multi-vehicle pileups
Chain-reaction crashes on I-290 or the Dan Ryan Expressway involve multiple drivers, each potentially bearing some fault. Illinois law allows fault distribution among all responsible parties, meaning several insurance companies may contribute to your compensation.
These cases grow complicated quickly. Sorting out which driver’s actions caused which injuries requires careful evidence analysis and often involves multiple claims proceeding simultaneously.
How Can a Car Accident Lawyer Protect Your Claim?
Insurance companies have teams of adjusters, investigators, and attorneys working to minimize payouts. Going up against them without legal representation puts you at a disadvantage, especially when fault percentages remain disputed.
Building a strong evidence file
Your attorney starts gathering evidence immediately. This includes obtaining the full police report, identifying and interviewing witnesses, sending preservation letters to businesses with surveillance footage, and requesting all available traffic camera recordings.
Medical records documenting your injuries, treatment timeline, and prognosis also matter. Comprehensive documentation strengthens both your damages claim and your position on fault allocation.
Countering unfair blame
When an insurance adjuster assigns you 40% fault, your attorney examines the basis for that number. Often, adjusters rely on incomplete information or interpret evidence in ways that favor their company.
Challenging inflated fault assignments involves presenting alternative interpretations of the evidence, highlighting facts the adjuster overlooked, and sometimes retaining accident reconstruction or medical professionals to provide independent analysis.
Negotiating from strength
Settlement negotiations improve when the insurance company knows you have solid evidence and legal representation willing to take the case to trial if necessary. Insurance adjusters calculate risk when deciding how much to offer. A well-prepared claim with strong fault arguments commands higher settlement values.
The Statute of Limitations Still Applies
Illinois gives car accident victims two years from the crash date to file a personal injury lawsuit under 735 ILCS 5/13-202. Missing this deadline eliminates your right to pursue compensation through the courts, regardless of how clear the other driver’s fault may be.
Comparative negligence claims often involve extended investigations and negotiations. Starting early preserves your options and prevents rushed decisions as deadlines approach.
Questions Clients Often Ask About Shared Fault in Illinois Car Accidents
When fault splits evenly at 50% each, you may still recover compensation under Illinois law. The 50% bar only applies when your fault exceeds 50%. At exactly 50%, your damages get reduced by half, but you retain recovery rights.
During settlement negotiations, insurance adjusters propose fault allocations based on their investigation. You and your attorney may counter with different percentages supported by evidence. If the case goes to trial, a jury determines fault percentages based on evidence presented by both sides.
Yes. Illinois’ comparative negligence rule applies to physical damage to property as well as bodily injury claims. Your vehicle repair or replacement compensation gets reduced by your assigned fault percentage.
Your own uninsured motorist coverage may apply when an at-fault driver lacks insurance. Comparative negligence rules still govern these claims. Your insurance company will investigate and may assign you partial fault, reducing your UM claim payout accordingly.
The personal injury lawyers at Walner Law work on contingency. We get paid only if we win your case. This approach allows everyone to access top-performing legal advocacy regardless of their financial situation. Initial consultations are free, allowing you to discuss your case without upfront costs.
Ready to Start Your Case? Get Your Free Consultation Today.
If you or someone you care about suffered injuries in a car accident in Chicago, Walner Law is ready to help. Our team fights to protect your claim from inflated fault assignments and pursues the compensation you need to move forward.
Call our team of experienced Chicago car accident attorneys today or contact us online for a free consultation. When you partner with Walner Law, your case gains the legal authority and leverage it needs to challenge even the biggest insurance companies.
